Package Details: plymouth-git 24.004.60.r34.gedc7c3ea-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/plymouth-git.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: plymouth-git
Description: Graphical boot splash screen (git version)
Upstream URL: https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/Plymouth/
Licenses: GPL-2.0-or-later
Conflicts: plymouth
Provides: plymouth
Submitter: PirateJonno
Maintainer: Taijian
Last Packager: Taijian
Votes: 274
Popularity: 0.000689
First Submitted: 2009-05-02 09:53 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-05-17 07:42 (UTC)

Required by (175)

Sources (6)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 .. 51 Next › Last »

ImNtReal commented on 2012-02-16 20:25 (UTC)

@ricardofunke, I don't blame you for wanting to leave initscripts on there. I just think it should be moved to optdepends, so it can be built without modifying the PKGBUILD if one is running with native systemd. I just switched to native, myself, thanks to the new systemd-sysvcompat package.

ricardofunke commented on 2012-02-16 20:22 (UTC)

Well @ImNtReal, I think it still works better with initscripts. For me, systemd option still have some problems that I'm working on... For example: 1. The plymouth-start.service stay with failed status in systemctl. 2. Sometimes, actually most of them, plymouth don't work on shutdown or reboot. Are these problems happening with you too?

ImNtReal commented on 2012-02-16 20:00 (UTC)

It's working for me this way. I would recommend moving initscripts to optdepends, and maybe add systemd there, so people can tell they have a choice. Thanks.

ImNtReal commented on 2012-02-16 15:43 (UTC)

Does this really require initscripts, or will it run from native systemd, also?

ricardofunke commented on 2012-02-10 16:22 (UTC)

Well @Maxr, I've tested the checksum and it's still correct. Maybe you had some temporary trouble with your connection. So try again

Maxr commented on 2012-02-10 15:45 (UTC)

encrypt_hook ... FAILED wrong checksum?

ricardofunke commented on 2012-02-08 13:03 (UTC)

Agree @Det, done

Det commented on 2012-02-07 23:09 (UTC)

It should rather be an optdeb, since this one now includes systemd support.

ricardofunke commented on 2012-02-07 18:55 (UTC)

@webmeister, I agree

webmeister commented on 2012-02-07 18:33 (UTC)

Is the systemd dependency really necessary? The package seems to build and run fine without it.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 .. 51 Next › Last »