Package Details: plymouth-git 24.004.60.r34.gedc7c3ea-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/plymouth-git.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: plymouth-git
Description: Graphical boot splash screen (git version)
Upstream URL: https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/Plymouth/
Licenses: GPL-2.0-or-later
Conflicts: plymouth
Provides: plymouth
Submitter: PirateJonno
Maintainer: Taijian
Last Packager: Taijian
Votes: 274
Popularity: 0.001911
First Submitted: 2009-05-02 09:53 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-05-17 07:42 (UTC)

Required by (172)

Sources (6)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 .. 51 Next › Last »

ricardofunke commented on 2012-02-03 19:58 (UTC)

Done @Det fixes! #Todo: 1. Aply the settings "StandartInput=null" to rc-local.services without package conflicts 2. Add systemD units files if possible @Shaeffer, I don't forgot you! ;)

ricardofunke commented on 2012-02-03 19:38 (UTC)

Ok @Det, I'll do that Thank you

Det commented on 2012-02-03 19:20 (UTC)

So could you please also use '--depth 1' with 'git clone' (to not fetch the complete history) and fix the encrypt_hook patch (you can grab it from the tarball I linked, remember to update the sha1sum)? Thank-you. E: nevermind, didn't see your reply there.

ricardofunke commented on 2012-02-03 19:09 (UTC)

Ok @Det, done. As soon as possible I'll verify your package and the @Shaeffer request. Thanks

Det commented on 2012-02-03 19:00 (UTC)

I think it's the same as with plymouth, meaning: # Conbtributor: Det <nimetonmaili at gmail dot com> # Contributor: Biginoz <biginoz _at_ free _point_ fr> # Contributor: PirateJonno <j@skurvy.no-ip.org>

ricardofunke commented on 2012-02-03 18:16 (UTC)

Well @Det, I think you're right about the list of contributors. But I don't have the list anymore, if you have it, please, post here and I'll put back again.

ricardofunke commented on 2012-02-03 18:08 (UTC)

@Det, this package was orphan for a long time. This means that there was no mainteiners, much less contributors! Man, I know you want to contribute and that you have skills, but I cannot understand why you have to be so rude...

Det commented on 2012-02-03 16:58 (UTC)

@ricardofunke, that's not how it goes. The "contributors" list means that those people have _at some point_ been maintainers of this package (or helped in some other major way). You can't just remove them just because you don't know them and I don't see how this qualifies as a psychiatric problem on my side.

divansantana commented on 2012-02-03 16:52 (UTC)

@Det There's no need to disrespect. One can still get their point across in a more helpful way. Thanks @ricardofunke for your work and patience.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 .. 51 Next › Last »