Package Details: polymc 1.4.3-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/polymc.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: polymc
Description: Minecraft launcher with the ability to manage multiple instances
Upstream URL: https://github.com/PolyMC/PolyMC
Licenses: GPL3
Submitter: glorious-yellow
Maintainer: Kaydax (sperg512)
Last Packager: blakkheim
Votes: 60
Popularity: 1.89
First Submitted: 2022-01-11 20:53 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2022-11-13 01:41 (UTC)

Dependencies (17)

Required by (1)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last »

blakkheim commented on 2023-01-30 15:26 (UTC)

@trainzkid Not good advice. This package depends on the shared library quazip-qt6 provides. All you need to do is rebuild it with the updated package installed (1.4 in this case).

trainzkid commented on 2023-01-30 06:43 (UTC)

For anyone getting the error related to missing libquazip1-qt6.so.1.3.0 like I just did, either downgrade quazip-qt6 to version 1.3-1 or switch (like most others are) to polymc-bin instead.

sperg512 commented on 2022-11-11 15:50 (UTC)

Yeah, this package is maintained by an inactive troll account trying to hold the package hostage. Use polymc-bin or git for now.

phi-uawj commented on 2022-11-11 14:11 (UTC)

This doesn't work for me. When I try to add my Microsoft minecraft account the window gets stuck on 'Working...'. I used polymc-bin (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/polymc-bin) instead and it works fine.

haxie commented on 2022-11-02 15:26 (UTC)

My apologies Foxboron.

Foxboron commented on 2022-11-02 09:20 (UTC)

Please stop using the comment field on this package as a debate forum.

hockeymikey commented on 2022-10-31 16:23 (UTC)

  1. Yes they did. Please research and educate yourself more on the subject :)
  2. Sure it does, if other maintainers are, in your eyes, trying to destroy the project with their creative vision. I would do the same thing to protect the users.
  3. Yes they did. Again, not my fault you aren't as well versed on the topic as you can be.
  4. Your opinions are not facts. Please stop spreading misinformation.
  5. Never said he was THE creator.
  6. Yes you have, quit lying. You literally just did again.

haxie commented on 2022-10-31 16:08 (UTC)

@hockeymikey - 1. The maintainers did not threaten to kick Lenny out. 2. Even if they had? That does not give Lenny the right to perform a hostile takeover. 3. None of the members took part in slander, please stop spreading those lies. 4. You wish to give control of a package to someone who has shown themselves to be unstable, and has added a known malware developer to the organisation members. I'd say that's pretty biased. 5. Lenny is not the creator of the project. 6. " I never called anyone names." - neither have I.

CrezyDud commented on 2022-10-25 18:16 (UTC)

i like polymc

based owner.

hockeymikey commented on 2022-10-21 14:06 (UTC)

@haxie It logically follows when other members are threatening to kick you out and being hostile. Well I would browse more, there is very much evidence and being very unreasonable. It's just drama at the end of the day, I wouldn't fault either party too much.

He didn't do anything that's true. But from what we've seen from other members and the slander, one has to be on guard for someone in a position like that and could be biased.

Everyone is biased, but I'm not heavily, very much in the middle. A creator is biased towards his project and that's why it makes sense giving them access. Oh are they now? Glad you're the arbitrator of morals and authority here, lmao. You are doing the same thing I was doing, actually worse I never called anyone names. I would check your own behavior until you try to take the moral high road, and that's the end of it.