Package Details: firefox-beta-bin 138.0rc1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/firefox-beta-bin.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: firefox-beta-bin
Description: Standalone web browser from mozilla.org - Beta
Upstream URL: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/channel/#beta
Keywords: gecko
Licenses: GPL, MPL, LGPL
Conflicts: firefox-beta
Provides: firefox
Submitter: Schnouki
Maintainer: symen (bittin)
Last Packager: bittin
Votes: 400
Popularity: 0.58
First Submitted: 2010-07-07 09:05 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-04-22 07:51 (UTC)

Dependencies (13)

Required by (172)

Sources (4)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 .. 51 Next › Last »

fsckd commented on 2011-08-18 16:38 (UTC)

Please quote, e.g. cd "$srcdir" instead of cd $srcdir. Thanks. :)

axil42 commented on 2011-08-13 15:35 (UTC)

Now I feel like first grade in english class... Sorry man I misunderstood you big time. Thanks for your concern :)

Det commented on 2011-08-13 15:23 (UTC)

Christ, please, tell me, have I really grown friggin incapable of forwarding information? I meant _other_ people that if you disowned it (and if it wasn't flagged out-of-date) then _other_ people would kindly just flag it instead of even thinking of doing the oh-so-hard updating themselves (even if they actually opened up the browser and came all the way up here to do the flagging). I didn't mean you, take all the time you need in your vacation, have a good time and definitely don't let people like me let you feel bad about it.

axil42 commented on 2011-08-13 15:07 (UTC)

First of all I wasn't the one that flagged it out of date. I'm on vacation right now and cannot update it. I really can't understand your hostile tone man. If you think that I'm incapable of maintaining it I'll gladly disown it.

Det commented on 2011-08-13 14:55 (UTC)

If you care enough to make a comment about it would it be all too bad to disown it for other people to update it? Well, admittably it would be pretty talented to find someone willing to do that instead of just flagging..

axil42 commented on 2011-08-13 13:20 (UTC)

Unfortunately I won't be near a computer till thursday and thus the package will have to be outdated till then... Thanks.

Det commented on 2011-07-12 13:15 (UTC)

@sironitomas, you honestly didn't see the two posts right before yours? Also, a little Googling reveals this bug report filed upstream: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=668997

sironitomas commented on 2011-07-12 12:50 (UTC)

While trying to open the preferences window in gnome3, Firefox crashes. This is the output: /opt/firefox-beta-bin-6.0b1/firefox-bin: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/libfile.so: undefined symbol: gnome_vfs_unescape_string Is this a Firefox bug or a packaging one?

axil42 commented on 2011-07-11 10:40 (UTC)

@Cdh yeap, I can confirm this...

haagch commented on 2011-07-10 08:14 (UTC)

When I try to open pdf files with an external program I get /opt/firefox-beta-bin-6.0b1/firefox-bin: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/libfile.so: undefined symbol: gnome_vfs_unescape_string Can anybody reproduce? Does it need a newer gnome-vfs?

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 .. 51 Next › Last »