Package Details: qt5-webkit 5.212.0alpha4-26

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/qt5-webkit.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: qt5-webkit
Description: Classes for a WebKit2 based implementation and a new QML API
Upstream URL: https://github.com/qtwebkit/qtwebkit
Licenses: LGPL2.1
Submitter: arojas
Maintainer: FabioLolix
Last Packager: FabioLolix
Votes: 41
Popularity: 0.69
First Submitted: 2022-11-21 07:42 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-09-03 21:23 (UTC)

Required by (116)

Sources (9)

Pinned Comments

FabioLolix commented on 2024-08-20 14:12 (UTC)

btw patches are welcome here https://github.com/FabioLolix/PKGBUILD-AUR_fix/tree/master/q

FabioLolix commented on 2024-05-24 12:05 (UTC)

qt5-webkit-movableink-git prebuild uploaded on sourceforge, thanks to MoetaYuko for the patch

About the comments; I'm starting to get really pissed off; please refrain to stating the obvious, make questions already answered, reporting already reported stuff, the icu solutions work for installed packages whenever how quirk they are, etc, etc, etc....

If you wanna post, post a patch!

I'm not a programmer but I guess webengine would be more convenient

@TheExplorer You don't say! [insert Nicals Cage meme]

If this package would never build in the future, shouldn't it be dropped in favor of qt5-webkit-movableink-git?

@oldherl have you tried to read the post before yours before posting, you should try that

FabioLolix commented on 2024-05-23 08:40 (UTC)

Post another time that this fails to build with icu 75 and I'll no longer upload the pre-build packages, I have qt5-webkit-movableink-git ready. You have been warned.

Have been posted enough icu 74 solution too.

FabioLolix commented on 2023-12-27 15:49 (UTC)

btw, depends on libicuuc.so have been added so you are obliged to uninstall and rebuild when there is a new icu update instead of keeping a non-working qt5-webkit (which lead to other build issues)

xiota commented on 2023-11-12 17:30 (UTC)

Or read: makepkg: Improving build times.

FabioLolix commented on 2023-01-06 17:06 (UTC)

Pre builded (in clean chroot) package here https://sourceforge.net/projects/fabiololix-os-archive/files/Packages/ for who is interested

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 .. 21 Next › Last »

username227 commented on 2024-05-19 20:30 (UTC)

pkg no longer builds. gives an error around 3 or 4%, including in clean chroot.

df8oe commented on 2024-05-19 17:27 (UTC)

Does no longer build:

/build/qt5-webkit/src/qtwebkit-5.212.0-alpha4/Source/WTF/wtf/text/StringOperators.h:88:63: note: remove the ‘< >’
/build/qt5-webkit/src/qtwebkit-5.212.0-alpha4/Source/WTF/wtf/text/StringView.h:503:35: warning: template-id not allowed for constructor in C++20 [-Wtemplate-id-cdtor]
503 | StringTypeAdapter<StringView>(StringView string) | ^~
/build/qt5-webkit/src/qtwebkit-5.212.0-alpha4/Source/WTF/wtf/text/StringView.h:503:35: note: remove the ‘< >’

FabioLolix commented on 2024-05-18 19:59 (UTC)

@MehdiChinoune you already let me know that

TheExplorer commented on 2024-05-17 16:28 (UTC)

@Universebenzene Oh, I see. That's a damn big list, yes. What I mean is that maintainers should really think about switching since qt5-webkit has already been dropped and abandoned.

Universebenzene commented on 2024-05-17 15:00 (UTC)

@korimitsu Have you tried the patch I gave in the comment on May 11th?

Universebenzene commented on 2024-05-17 14:58 (UTC) (edited on 2024-05-17 14:59 (UTC) by Universebenzene)

@TheExplorer Just see "Required by" in this page.

TheExplorer commented on 2024-05-17 14:32 (UTC)

For example f5vpn

I wonder what stops the maintainer to switch to qt5-webengine, for example. Or if it's so bugged then why not use vpn configs in NetworkManager? Does that service provide configs alone?

popaul commented on 2024-05-17 13:59 (UTC) (edited on 2024-05-17 14:00 (UTC) by popaul)

What for does anyone need this now? Just got curious.

For example f5vpn: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/f5vpn . Folks are posting issues about qt5-webkit too there. But f5vpn is also bugged in its own ways...

TheExplorer commented on 2024-05-17 13:56 (UTC)

I guess nobody wants to maintain the binary builds for this. The latest was in December 2023 in different Arch-based distro's repos as well as personal ones. We should really ditch this old stuff and switch to something else.

What for does anyone need this now? Just got curious.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 .. 21 Next › Last »