Package Details: firefox-kde-opensuse 127.0-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/firefox-kde-opensuse.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: firefox-kde-opensuse
Description: Standalone web browser from mozilla.org with OpenSUSE patch, integrate better with KDE
Upstream URL: https://github.com/openSUSE/firefox-maintenance
Keywords: browser gecko web
Licenses: GPL, MPL, LGPL
Conflicts: firefox
Provides: firefox
Submitter: csslayer
Maintainer: Thaodan
Last Packager: Thaodan
Votes: 336
Popularity: 0.181110
First Submitted: 2009-12-11 09:10 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-07-21 20:54 (UTC)

Dependencies (56)

Required by (171)

Sources (37)

Pinned Comments

Thaodan commented on 2021-04-20 17:40 (UTC) (edited on 2021-04-21 22:45 (UTC) by Thaodan)

If you have issues with this package visit gitlab and read the readme first.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 .. 139 Next › Last »

a7med commented on 2019-01-10 18:10 (UTC)

it stop working after latest update it gives this error "Illegal instruction (core dumped)" on opening

AJSlye commented on 2019-01-09 13:45 (UTC) (edited on 2019-01-09 14:54 (UTC) by AJSlye)

Licencing is what GNU has to do with the conversation. Gcc is the GNU C compiler.

Besides, I'm sure BSD, Windows, Mac, and other OS developers couldn't give 2 cents about gcc vs clang. AFAIK, Linux is not even the majority of Mozilla's user base.

Thaodan commented on 2019-01-09 13:41 (UTC)

It is but its not just some. Only Suse and Arch are currenlty using clang for firefox. Mozilla can use what they want but still have to support GCC if the majority of Linux distros are using GCC. I dont know what GNU has to do with Firefox.

Thaodan commented on 2019-01-09 13:22 (UTC)

Some so Fedora/Red Hat are some Linux devs? i don't think thats Linux zealot BS.

Thaodan commented on 2019-01-09 09:14 (UTC)

Mozilla just wants to maintain one compiler. I don't think that a monoculture is a good move. I dont think its good to build one package against another compiler. Theres a reason for such policy in fedora.

Thaodan commented on 2019-01-09 05:43 (UTC) (edited on 2019-01-09 05:51 (UTC) by Thaodan)

@AJSlye: upstream arch just followed the others. There was no infight just a short thought switch. Any way: thanks to the workaround from fedora and the fixes from Jan Hubička I was able to restore pgo support with gcc and also to remove the gcc7 workaround. On top of that lto is also enabled. If anyone wants to read my sources on the fix:

http://hubicka.blogspot.com/2018/12/even-more-fun-with-building-and.html

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/firefox/tree/master

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 .. 139 Next › Last »