Package Details: ttf-ms-win8-zh_cn 6.3.9600.17238-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/ttf-ms-win8.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: ttf-ms-win8
Description: Microsoft Windows 8.1 Latin and International TrueType fonts
Upstream URL: http://www.microsoft.com/typography/fonts/product.aspx?PID=161
Licenses: custom
Conflicts: ttf-ms-fonts, ttf-tahoma, ttf-vista-fonts, ttf-win7-fonts, ttf-win7-fonts-autodownload
Provides: ttf-font, ttf-ms-fonts, ttf-tahoma, ttf-vista-fonts, ttf-win7-fonts
Submitter: reflexing
Maintainer: severach
Last Packager: severach
Votes: 62
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2012-06-08 06:11 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2017-07-13 07:10 (UTC)

Required by (290)

Sources (8)

Pinned Comments

severach commented on 2018-03-01 20:05 (UTC)

Package is not broken. You can't build this with yaourt or pamac. It must be built with makepkg after obtaining the fonts manually.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 .. 34 Next › Last »

bkhl commented on 2013-07-18 09:06 (UTC)

The PKGBUILD comment says any build of 6.2.9200.16384 while the pkgver string and the md5sums are still for 6.2.9200.20569. (Ask me if you need the checksums.)

orschiro commented on 2013-07-15 06:39 (UTC)

@ajcr Have you checked whether arial.ttf exists inside of your build directory? This package does not automatically download and add the required fonts due to licensing problems. Instead you need to download the fonts yourself. Search the web for download options.

<deleted-account> commented on 2013-07-15 06:10 (UTC)

==> Making package: ttf-ms-win8 6.2.9200.20569-1 (Mon Jul 15 02:09:01 EDT 2013) ==> Checking runtime dependencies... ==> Checking buildtime dependencies... ==> Retrieving sources... ==> ERROR: arial.ttf was not found in the build directory and is not a URL. The build failed.

reflexing commented on 2013-07-03 06:52 (UTC)

@orschiro that's newer files checksums from KB2785094. Please read previous comments. Just update checksums and install.

orschiro commented on 2013-07-03 06:49 (UTC)

@reflexing Well, then I am curious why the fonts differ according to their checksum. Any ideas?

reflexing commented on 2013-07-03 06:29 (UTC)

@orschiro not yet

orschiro commented on 2013-07-03 04:18 (UTC)

I just downloaded the fonts from the MSW8.RTM.MSDN.Build and some of them did not pass the checksum check. Did you already update to 8.1?

reflexing commented on 2013-07-01 16:27 (UTC)

@Malstrond post a bug to Libreoffice upstream please (or Freetype maybe, it's hard to tell from your "bug report").

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 .. 34 Next › Last »