Package Details: pandoc-bin 3.5-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/pandoc-bin.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: pandoc-bin
Description: Conversion between documentation formats
Upstream URL: https://pandoc.org
Licenses: GPL-2.0-or-later
Conflicts: pandoc-cli
Provides: pandoc, pandoc-cli
Submitter: cdkitching
Maintainer: a821
Last Packager: a821
Votes: 309
Popularity: 1.89
First Submitted: 2017-10-03 08:45 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-10-06 10:31 (UTC)

Dependencies (9)

Required by (330)

Sources (3)

Pinned Comments

cdkitching commented on 2023-09-22 09:07 (UTC)

Using this package will waste instead of save disk space if:

  • You're a haskell developer and need the shared libraries/compilers/etc. anyway.
  • You have >10 other statically-linked haskell packages around the same size as Pandoc (in which case you'll get a saving from making them all dynamically linked).

Neither of these scenarios is particularly likely.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 5 6 7 8 9 10

joelongjiamian commented on 2017-06-25 20:39 (UTC) (edited on 2017-06-25 20:42 (UTC) by joelongjiamian)

That's not quite true; the total size once installed is still nontrivial. Here's the output from pacman -S pandoc-citeproc for me: resolving dependencies... looking for conflicting packages... Packages (59) ghc-8.0.2-1 haskell-aeson-1.1.2.0-6 haskell-aeson-pretty-0.8.5-2 (etc) Total Download Size: 52.25 MiB Total Installed Size: 544.46 MiB Net Upgrade Size: 493.11 MiB As far as I can tell most of this comes from ghc. In any case, it appears that pandoc-citeproc is also provided by the debian package, so I guess it might be easier to add a package_pandoc-citeproc() to your PKGBUILD.

cdkitching commented on 2017-06-25 20:07 (UTC)

The -static name was already taken by a defunct package. That was the first thing I tried...

cdkitching commented on 2017-06-25 20:06 (UTC)

Pandoc-citeproc in community pulls in a much smaller set of Haskell packages, so doing this for that package saves you only around 50MB, rather than the 700 you get from this

Alad commented on 2017-06-25 14:27 (UTC) (edited on 2017-06-25 14:36 (UTC) by Alad)

Could you please give it some meaningful name instead of the nonsensical "lite"... i.e. pandoc-static, pandoc-bin, pandoc-hackage, etc.

joelongjiamian commented on 2017-06-25 12:39 (UTC)

any plans for pandoc-citeproc too? same thing happened to that