Package Details: pam-selinux 1.6.1-3

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/pam-selinux.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: pam-selinux
Description: SELinux aware PAM (Pluggable Authentication Modules) library
Upstream URL: http://linux-pam.org
Keywords: selinux
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Groups: selinux
Conflicts: pam, selinux-pam
Provides: libpam.so, libpamc.so, libpam_misc.so, pam, selinux-pam
Submitter: Siosm
Maintainer: IooNag
Last Packager: IooNag
Votes: 22
Popularity: 0.000878
First Submitted: 2013-11-03 20:05 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-09-07 13:41 (UTC)

Required by (835)

Sources (2)

Pinned Comments

IooNag commented on 2021-10-10 19:27 (UTC)

WARNING: When upgrading a system using pam-selinux, it is recommended to keep a root shell open in a different session/terminal to fix issues, as the authentication system could break when a dependency is updated. For example when libnsl 2.0.0 was released, /usr/lib/security/pam_unix.so could no longer be loaded and pam-selinux needed to be rebuilt/updated in order to fix the authentication system.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last »

xangelux commented on 2013-02-09 17:46 (UTC)

@Siosm: it doesn't build, the clasic warning about configure.in should be .ac, the AC_LANG_CONFTEST instead of AC_LANG_SOURCE and one error: parallel-tests: error: required file 'build-aux/test-driver' not found

xangelux commented on 2013-02-09 17:32 (UTC)

Should I test it? I mean, will it break my system or just make it uncofortable if it doesn't work?

Siosm commented on 2013-02-09 13:26 (UTC)

@xangelux: You can try the PKGBUILD and the patches (some from Fedora) available here: https://git.siosm.fr/siosm-selinux/tree/selinux-pam?h=untested WARNING: I have NOT tested it yet!

xangelux commented on 2013-02-09 07:53 (UTC)

I've been looking for an answer, but no luck, any luck in your part?

Nicky726 commented on 2012-11-18 18:26 (UTC)

OK, so with version 1.1.6 I managed to get the pam build with a patch from Fedora, but the build of pam_unix2 fails. That seems to be SELinux specific, but Fedora does not use it, so I don't know where to look for patches. From what I read in the bugzilla thread, it could be omitted. In that case I just hit problem in make install of pam, when it tries to create a directory in /var/run. I'll try to figure out what options to send to make or make install so that it creates the directory in $pkgdir.

<deleted-account> commented on 2012-11-12 22:13 (UTC)

The issue still not fix, i tried two patch.

Nicky726 commented on 2012-07-20 06:17 (UTC)

Hi, I reported a bug because of that: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/30645 Please try it there, as it concerns the [core] version too and is not SELinux specific.

xangelux commented on 2012-07-19 23:02 (UTC)

I think I found a patch here, http://patches.openembedded.org/patch/31245/ but someone says there needs to be a sign of some sort, what do you think?

xangelux commented on 2012-07-19 22:51 (UTC)

I'm trying to build this, and fails on function ‘_unix_run_verify_binary’ in the pam_unix_acct.c file, it complains of not knowing the storage size of rlim, RLIMIT_NOFILE has not been declared

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last »