| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/wine-ge-custom.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | wine-ge-custom |
| Description: | A compatibility layer for running Windows programs - GloriousEggroll branch |
| Upstream URL: | https://github.com/GloriousEggroll/wine-ge-custom |
| Licenses: | LGPL-2.1-or-later |
| Conflicts: | wine |
| Provides: | wine |
| Submitter: | loathingkernel |
| Maintainer: | loathingkernel |
| Last Packager: | loathingkernel |
| Votes: | 36 |
| Popularity: | 1.44 |
| First Submitted: | 2021-09-01 22:06 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2024-05-26 15:20 (UTC) |
Similar problem like with wine-lol but idk how to resolve this:
configure: error: FreeType 64-bit development files not found. Fonts will not be built.
Use the --without-freetype option if you really want this.
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().
Aborting...
sudo pacman -Qq | egrep "freetype"
egrep: warning: egrep is obsolescent; using grep -E
freetype2
lib32-freetype2
@begin-theadventu The reason I personally consider it a bad idea can be found in the pinned comments.
The reason why I didn't make a PKGBUILD repackaging the binary package in AUR is because such a package is useless to me.
What's the reason for the lack of a binary package, even though packages are built on GitHub?
@loathingkernel I'm happy with this package as a replacement for wine and wine staging. I use this package as my base wine and it takes precedence on my system.
What's the reason AVX is disabled?
Question towards anyone using this package, do you think it should be made to be install-able alongside regular wine or wine-staging from the repos but requiring some configuration overhead, or it is fine in the current state replacing those?
@bootlegbilly Refer here for the reasoning https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/proton-ge-custom
In short, feel free to try it, but I can neither filter nor test with any possible flags that might cause breakages. It is left as an exercise to the user.
How come the PKGBUILD overwites any custom CFLAGS? Is there a reason this can't be built with -march=native, -flto, or -O3?
In addition to loathingkernel's PKGBUILDs on GitHub & ptr1337's repo, the Chaotic-AUR repo also provides automated compiled binaries for this package: https://aur.chaotic.cx/
Pinned Comments
loathingkernel commented on 2022-03-02 14:12 (UTC)
@Strykar Nope, see https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wine-ge-custom#comment-831304
You can grab compiled packages from https://github.com/loathingKernel/PKGBUILDs/releases/tag/packages
loathingkernel commented on 2021-10-15 10:01 (UTC) (edited on 2021-10-15 10:04 (UTC) by loathingkernel)
@thaewrapt, I see, you might be correct. The prebuilt package is not a good candidate for packaging for a couple of reasons. First of all, it is built using Lutris's runtime, and as such inherits the same issues as Proton, namely it is at its best when running inside that runtime. Also, although I might be wrong here, I haven't found any mention of Lutris being able to use a system-wide installation directory in the same way Steam can. For these reasons, I believe that packaging those binaries is pointless and they should be managed by Lutris itself.