Package Details: jre 23.0.1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/jdk.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: jdk
Description: Oracle Java Runtime Environment
Upstream URL: https://www.oracle.com/java/
Licenses: LicenseRef-custom
Conflicts: jdk
Provides: java-runtime, java-runtime-headless, java-runtime-headless-jdk, java-runtime-jdk23, jre23-jdk, jre23-jdk-headless
Submitter: td123
Maintainer: dbermond
Last Packager: dbermond
Votes: 1086
Popularity: 0.119396
First Submitted: 2011-08-27 17:56 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-16 14:08 (UTC)

Dependencies (12)

Required by (1730)

Sources (9)

Pinned Comments

dbermond commented on 2024-03-19 19:54 (UTC)

  • Important notice:

As was made with the java packages in the official repositories, jdk now provides the jre alongside it, and both packages conflict with each other. During the package upgrade to version 22, act accordingly to your needs. For example, if you have both jdk and jre installed, only jdk will be sufficient, as it now also contains the runtime environment, and jre can be uninstalled. If you have only jre installed, no action is required.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 .. 81 Next › Last »

<deleted-account> commented on 2015-07-11 05:26 (UTC)

As you say "for the search function" as I thing that a java package need jave java as one of they keywords, if someone search for java using only keywords then will sure be apreciated the corect tagging, those arent anymore groups, they are keyword and therefor are key for search word and so need to be correctly seted.

Det commented on 2015-07-09 09:32 (UTC)

The keywords are meant for the search function and not really to pretify the package page.

<deleted-account> commented on 2015-07-09 09:30 (UTC)

you coud add jdk and java to the keywords too?

kkl2401 commented on 2015-05-25 08:14 (UTC)

Det: You're right, I completely missed the out-of-date flag. I've updated the package to 8.45 but I'll disown it right now. Feel free to adopt it, you'll be a better maintainer.

Det commented on 2015-04-24 08:39 (UTC)

They don't actually need to be, since they are sourced ("source <name>.sh" OR ". <name>.sh"), not executed ("./<name>.sh"): - https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Autostarting#.2Fetc.2Fprofile - https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/22036 Any package doing that is either a leftover of the old behavior (fixed in December 2010), or how upstream does things.

axper commented on 2015-04-24 08:35 (UTC)

The files at /etc/profile.d/jre*.sh aren't executable

truh commented on 2015-04-15 15:11 (UTC)

> jdk-8u45-linux-x64.tar.gz ... FAILED never mind, did only happen the first time.

truh commented on 2015-04-15 15:10 (UTC)

==> Validating source files with md5sums... jdk-8u45-linux-x64.tar.gz ... FAILED ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check! ==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build jdk.

MartyTM commented on 2015-03-20 20:03 (UTC)

Awesome, glad I could help. Thanks for the quick responses and packaging!

Det commented on 2015-03-19 19:27 (UTC)

That's exactly right. The HighContrast and LowContrast icons have been deprecated in at least GNOME way back in 2.22 [1], which was already available in Arch in April 2008 [2]. I've removed those from all of my Java packages. Thanks very much for your contribution! [1] = https://developer.gnome.org/hig-book/unstable/icons-design-accessible.html.en [2] = https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/commit/trunk?h=packages/gnome-control-center&id=d801cae824fc5f62f92415576ede3d2c226a2f8f

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 .. 81 Next › Last »