Package Details: jdk 23.0.1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/jdk.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: jdk
Description: Oracle Java Development Kit
Upstream URL: https://www.oracle.com/java/
Licenses: LicenseRef-custom
Conflicts: jre
Provides: java-environment, java-environment-jdk, java-runtime, java-runtime-headless, java-runtime-headless-jdk, java-runtime-jdk23, jdk23-jdk, jre, jre23-jdk, jre23-jdk-headless
Submitter: td123
Maintainer: dbermond
Last Packager: dbermond
Votes: 1086
Popularity: 0.124486
First Submitted: 2011-08-27 17:56 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-16 14:08 (UTC)

Required by (2651)

Sources (9)

Pinned Comments

dbermond commented on 2024-03-19 19:54 (UTC)

  • Important notice:

As was made with the java packages in the official repositories, jdk now provides the jre alongside it, and both packages conflict with each other. During the package upgrade to version 22, act accordingly to your needs. For example, if you have both jdk and jre installed, only jdk will be sufficient, as it now also contains the runtime environment, and jre can be uninstalled. If you have only jre installed, no action is required.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 .. 81 Next › Last »

Det commented on 2017-04-20 05:02 (UTC) (edited on 2017-04-20 05:05 (UTC) by Det)

You edited your comment, but again, _what_ balking and "6 months ago" do you mean :D? I don't see a single comment here or in my mailbox of this "notification". :D

Det commented on 2017-04-20 04:58 (UTC)

You need the cookie flag in the commandline (line 23: https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=jdk).

liljaylj commented on 2017-04-19 22:02 (UTC)

idk, this message shows up when it tries to download jdk-8u131-linux-x64.tar.gz. i tried to open url in browser and it says "Unauthorized Request". problem solved: i've manually downloaded package from oracle.com and placed near PKGBUILD i know my english is awful, sorry

Det commented on 2017-04-19 16:52 (UTC)

Hmm. Can you point me towards the issue and the comment that was brought about _friggin_ "6 months ago", and my quote of refusal to fix it? :D

WoefulDerelict commented on 2017-04-19 16:51 (UTC) (edited on 2017-04-19 16:57 (UTC) by WoefulDerelict)

Det: You were notified there was an issue six months ago, baulked about fixing it and later pushed out an update with the same issue. A sane .gitignore would be so easy and have saved everyone the headache.

Det commented on 2017-04-19 14:38 (UTC)

Where what?

Det commented on 2017-04-19 14:37 (UTC)

I don't live in a perfect world, but "this long" = less than 24 hours. Different files.

WoefulDerelict commented on 2017-04-19 04:01 (UTC) (edited on 2017-04-19 17:01 (UTC) by WoefulDerelict)

The AUR still contains incomplete zip files which have to be deleted after extracting the snapshot or cloning the repository as they interfere with properly building the package. These should have never been pushed to the AUR.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 .. 81 Next › Last »