Package Details: jdk 23.0.1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/jdk.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: jdk
Description: Oracle Java Development Kit
Upstream URL: https://www.oracle.com/java/
Licenses: LicenseRef-custom
Conflicts: jre
Provides: java-environment, java-environment-jdk, java-runtime, java-runtime-headless, java-runtime-headless-jdk, java-runtime-jdk23, jdk23-jdk, jre, jre23-jdk, jre23-jdk-headless
Submitter: td123
Maintainer: dbermond
Last Packager: dbermond
Votes: 1086
Popularity: 0.117008
First Submitted: 2011-08-27 17:56 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-16 14:08 (UTC)

Required by (2651)

Sources (9)

Pinned Comments

dbermond commented on 2024-03-19 19:54 (UTC)

  • Important notice:

As was made with the java packages in the official repositories, jdk now provides the jre alongside it, and both packages conflict with each other. During the package upgrade to version 22, act accordingly to your needs. For example, if you have both jdk and jre installed, only jdk will be sufficient, as it now also contains the runtime environment, and jre can be uninstalled. If you have only jre installed, no action is required.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 Next › Last »

techlive commented on 2011-10-27 10:11 (UTC)

@Det Jdk indeed provides the 'java-environment',but while you are trying to replace the openjdk with jdk,the jre need to be install first as dependency which will fail passing the requirements check as not privoding the 'java-environment',so the replacement will get stucked here,just because the openjdk provides both java-runtime and java-enviroment and the jre only provide the java-runtime,the uninstllation of openjdk will be stopped because of some packages like eclipse need java-environment.How this problem be solved?

student975 commented on 2011-10-16 17:20 (UTC)

This way we have the same package twice: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51836 Probably regarding jdk-docs it will be handy for users to have the same scheme as for Oracle jdk itself. We have jdk6 (last java 6) and jdk (last Orcacle jdk, in fact - last java 7 now) packages. I guess it is expected to have the same scheme for docs also. I see all these coordination demands time from maintainers. Please, don't treat my message as any kind of claim - it's just opinion.

kkl2401 commented on 2011-10-16 17:09 (UTC)

Well, it was never my intention to maintain API documentation specifically for Java 6. Since the package is called jdk-docs, it should obviously contain documentation for the newest version. If anyone is interested, they can create jdk6-docs but it won't be me at the moment because right now I have no need for that.

student975 commented on 2011-10-16 16:21 (UTC)

AUR contains jdk7-docs already. How can we have docs for Oracle jdk 6 now?

kkl2401 commented on 2011-10-16 16:11 (UTC)

Updated.

Det commented on 2011-09-07 08:29 (UTC)

@ioos, you don't. Jdk provides 'java-environment(=7)': https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51906

rtimush commented on 2011-09-06 10:53 (UTC)

Agree with Boris-B, src.zip is an important part of the JDK.

<deleted-account> commented on 2011-09-03 08:18 (UTC)

How do I replace openjdk6 with jre when there are dependents of java-environment?

dotboris commented on 2011-09-01 15:56 (UTC)

In the PKGBUILD the src.zip file is removed form the root of the jdk install directory. This file is used by IDEs like eclipse to determine the name of certain thing such as function arguments. I think it would be preferable to leave it in the install.

kelytha commented on 2011-08-30 15:16 (UTC)

@kralyk: oops, you are right. I think I also understand why is it like this. NetBeans wants to have a JDK to be able to also develop Java apps in it. Didn't consider this at first, as I want to use it only for PHP development.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 Next › Last »